Jason Gillespie Slams PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi Over Missed Connection Camp: “Couldn’t Drive 20 Minutes”

In a fresh controversy that has added to the turbulence surrounding Pakistan cricket, former Test head coach Jason Gillespie has openly criticized Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi for his absence from a key team-building initiative. The former Australia pacer, who recently concluded his brief stint with the Pakistan red-ball team, did not mince words as he recounted the lack of support from the PCB’s top brass, particularly during what was described as a pivotal moment for fostering unity and communication within the squad.

Speaking on a podcast, Gillespie’s tone was firm and disappointed, especially when discussing Naqvi’s unwillingness to physically attend the “Connection Camp”—a special session jointly designed by him and Gary Kirsten, the white-ball head coach. The camp, held on September 23, 2024, aimed at improving collaboration, enhancing performance, and encouraging transparency among players and coaches. However, according to Gillespie, the event’s impact was diluted by the absence of the PCB’s highest-ranking official.

The Connection Camp: A Vision for Team Unity

The idea of the Connection Camp was birthed from a shared vision between Gillespie and Kirsten. The two coaches, both known for their professional integrity and deep understanding of team dynamics, believed that Pakistan’s national squad needed more than technical drills and tactical briefings. What the team lacked, they felt, was a strong interpersonal bond—something that could only be built through honest dialogue and shared experiences.

The camp’s core objective was to bridge the gap between players, coaches, and management.
It was meant to provide a platform where everyone could speak freely about their journeys, struggles, and aspirations within Pakistan cricket.
The session was not a standard training camp—it was designed as a collective therapy session, a humanizing experience to build trust and camaraderie.

Gillespie described it as “a great idea by Gary,” underlining that it was an effort not just for cricket, but for creating a sustainable, respectful culture inside the dressing room.

Flying In, Logging In: A Stark Contrast in Commitment

Jason Gillespie, currently based in Australia, made the long trip to Pakistan specifically for this event. Gary Kirsten, likewise, traveled from South Africa to be present in person. Their physical presence, despite the distance, was a clear signal of their commitment to the cause. However, what raised eyebrows was that PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi, despite being in Lahore—the same city where the camp was held—chose to attend the meeting via Zoom.

Gillespie did not hold back his frustration:

“Gary came up with this great idea of a connection camp. Everyone in Pakistan cricket basically shared their experiences in that meeting. I flew in from Australia, Gary flew in from South Africa, the Chairman Mohsin Naqvi dialed in Zoom.”

The tone of his comment was less about logistics and more about what it symbolized. Gillespie seemed genuinely disheartened by the optics: two international professionals traveling across continents, while the chairman of the PCB couldn’t spare a 20-minute drive to show solidarity with the national team.

He added:

“He is based in Lahore, but he did not come, while Gary came in from Africa. We both felt that the Chairman could not even drive 20 minutes to come here—that was a bit unusual.”

This wasn’t just a jab at Naqvi’s convenience. For Gillespie, the Chairman’s absence spoke volumes about the disconnect between the board and the team—a disconnection that might well be symptomatic of larger systemic issues within Pakistan cricket.

Why Presence Matters in Leadership

In the world of high-performance sports, symbolic gestures often carry more weight than words. Leadership is as much about being seen as it is about making decisions behind closed doors. Gillespie’s comments reflected this understanding—he seemed less angry and more disillusioned.

For players already battling on-field pressure, the presence of top officials at team-building events reinforces the sense of support and shared responsibility.
It creates a bridge between authority and athletes, softening hierarchical lines and promoting collective accountability.
An absent leader, on the other hand, sends the opposite message: detachment, indifference, or worse, disapproval.

By skipping the camp, Naqvi may not have intended to offend, but his actions gave rise to questions about his priorities and the kind of relationship he hopes to cultivate with the players and coaching staff.

The Broader Implications: Cracks in the System?

While Gillespie’s comments are recent, the undercurrent of dissatisfaction within the Pakistan cricket setup is not new. Over the years, the PCB has frequently been accused of inconsistency, politicization, and short-term planning. Coaches have come and gone, selection policies have shifted abruptly, and leadership roles have changed hands with little continuity.

This incident, though seemingly small, fits into a pattern:

It highlights a mismatch between rhetoric and action within PCB leadership.
It reflects a lack of engagement with initiatives that aim to address team culture, which is often cited as a weak point in Pakistan cricket.
And it underscores the fragile nature of relationships between coaches and administrators—something that has often derailed promising transitions in the past.

Gillespie and Kirsten’s initiative was exactly the kind of progressive move Pakistan cricket has long needed. That it didn’t receive full institutional backing is a missed opportunity.

Jason Gillespie’s Tenure: A Frustrating Exit

Jason Gillespie’s time as the Test head coach of Pakistan was short, but this parting shot suggests his experience may have been marred by administrative roadblocks. While he has not gone on a full-blown tirade, his choice to share this anecdote on a public platform indicates a deeper sense of disappointment.

His decision to highlight this moment is telling. It wasn’t about a tactical disagreement, a player selection debate, or match-day logistics—it was about a failure to connect. And for someone whose coaching philosophy centers around human relationships, that failure is perhaps the most painful.

Conclusion: A Message, Not Just a Criticism

Jason Gillespie’s remarks should not be seen purely as a personal dig at Mohsin Naqvi. Rather, they serve as a wake-up call to the PCB and cricket boards everywhere. If leadership is truly about culture and connection, then being present—physically and emotionally—is the bare minimum.

The Connection Camp was a well-intentioned move to realign Pakistan cricket’s internal values. That it proceeded without full institutional support might explain why such efforts have failed to produce lasting change in the past. If the PCB truly wishes to back its teams, it must start by standing alongside them—literally and figuratively.

Key Takeaways:

The Connection Camp was a joint effort by Jason Gillespie and Gary Kirsten to promote unity, open communication, and team culture within Pakistan’s cricket squad.
Jason Gillespie and Gary Kirsten both traveled internationally to attend the camp in person.
PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi, despite being based in Lahore, chose to join via Zoom—prompting criticism from Gillespie.
Gillespie called the Chairman’s absence “unusual”, suggesting it indicated a lack of engagement and support from the top.
The controversy reflects deeper issues within the PCB, including leadership detachment and missed opportunities to build strong internal relationships.

Ex-Coach Jason Gillespie Takes Brutal Swipe at PCB Chairman Over Team Decisions