The South Calcutta Law College controversy has sparked a storm across Bengal and beyond after the hiring of Monojit Mishra, the main accused in a brutal gang rape case. The college has since terminated Mishra’s services and rusticated two students, but major questions remain unanswered. The Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash reveal not only institutional negligence but also political entanglements that may have shielded the accused from scrutiny.
This article presents the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash while analyzing the deeper implications of the scandal on education governance, law enforcement, and public accountability.
1. Monojit Mishra Terminated After Public Outrage
The first and most immediate action in the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash was the termination of Monojit Mishra. The governing body of South Calcutta Law College made the announcement on July 2, following the arrest of Mishra and three others. Mishra, aged 31, was accused of raping a 24-year-old student inside the campus, an act reportedly recorded on camera.
College authorities swiftly ended his contractual role as a casual employee, bowing to massive student protests and media scrutiny. However, what added to public anger—and prompted the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash—was the revelation that Mishra had been hired despite at least 11 criminal cases against him, including molestation, assault, and property damage.
2. Students Rusticated, Security Contract Cancelled
Another key development among the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash was the rustication of two students—Pramit Mukherjee (20) and Zaib Ahmed (19)—both named as accomplices in the assault. These students were allegedly present during the gang rape and played roles in facilitating the crime.
Furthermore, the governing body canceled the college’s existing security contract and announced that a new agency would be hired. At least one female guard will now be mandatory. The security guard allegedly involved—Pinaki Banerjee (55)—was also arrested and remanded. The Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash underscore the depth of rot in the institutional apparatus meant to protect students.
3. Institutional Fear and Political Patronage Surface
Among the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash, perhaps the most disturbing is the alleged political influence that allowed Mishra to remain untouchable on campus. Associate Professor Haripada Banik stated openly that faculty feared Mishra and had previously alerted the police. Despite multiple complaints, he remained employed with his contract renewed every 45 days.
Even more shocking is that Mishra’s Facebook profile featured numerous photographs with Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders, including ministers in Mamata Banerjee’s cabinet. Governing body member Sibranjan Chatterjee hinted that the meeting approving Mishra’s hiring may not have had quorum, raising red flags about procedural violations.
The lack of background verification and unchecked political proximity are now front and center in the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash.
4. College Administration Silent on Class Resumption
Another significant item in the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash is the silence of the administration on resuming academic activities. While the office remains open, classes have been suspended indefinitely since June 30. Students who gathered outside the college gate expressed deep concern for their academic future.
Ashok Kumar Deb, the governing body president and TMC MLA from Budge Budge, announced administrative changes, including new campus hours (7 a.m. to 2 p.m.) and stricter access rules. However, when pressed by reporters on how Mishra was hired despite being arrested thrice—including once just four months ago—Deb dodged questions and left in his vehicle under police protection.
This refusal to address glaring administrative failures is what elevates this situation into the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash.
5. Calls for Bar Council Intervention and Salary Recovery
Rounding out the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash is the move to revoke Mishra’s legal license and recover all salaries paid to him. Governing body officials stated they would formally request the Bar Council of India to revoke Mishra’s license to practice law as a criminal lawyer.
Additionally, the administration plans to recover the full amount of salary drawn by Mishra during his employment. There are also discussions about providing financial support to the rape survivor’s family. However, it remains unclear whether these measures are sufficient to rebuild trust among students and staff.
These efforts form the last but crucial piece in the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash, signaling that institutional reform—however delayed—may finally be on the horizon.
Wider Implications of the Case
Beyond the Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash, the incident exposes a systemic failure in background checks, due diligence, and governance. That a person with a documented criminal record—including charges of molestation and assault—was not only allowed on campus but held power, is an indictment of how deeply entrenched political interference has become in educational institutions.
Moreover, the fear expressed by faculty members highlights an atmosphere of intimidation, not education. When those entrusted with shaping young minds cannot speak out against known threats, it’s not just an HR issue—it’s a democratic failure.
The Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash must act as a wake-up call for universities, governing bodies, and lawmakers alike. Institutional accountability cannot be an afterthought. It must be built into the very design of educational oversight.
Conclusion
The Top 5 Developments in Monojit Mishra Case After College Backlash are a snapshot of everything that went wrong at South Calcutta Law College—from poor hiring practices and lack of background checks to administrative silence and political shielding. While steps are now being taken, the long-term solution lies in systemic reform, regular audits, and an unflinching commitment to transparency.
Students, faculty, and citizens deserve better. And only by holding every institution to account can such atrocities be prevented in the future.